Sunday, July 21, 2024

Biden's out, Harris in...wait a minute, not so fast!

 Biden is one of few presidents to end a reelection campaign; Who were the others?

No other president seeking reelection has dropped out so late. President Harry S. Truman, after serving the better part of two terms, pulled out of the 1952 race in late March, after failing to win over a majority of voters at the New Hampshire Democratic presidential primary. President Lyndon B. Johnson later dropped out of the 1968 election, amid low approval ratings.

Does that make Harris the new Democrat Nominee? No!

Biden was not formally named the party nominee. At the DNC Convention the following month, during a virtual roll call would be when Biden was expected to be the official nominee.

Harris, who is the only candidate who can directly tap into the Biden war chest under federal campaign finance rules, stands as the party’s favorite to win the nomination.

Democrats are starting with an open convention.  An open convention means delegates could cast their ballot for any candidate. The candidate who gets a simple majority wins the nomination. If no candidate gets that simple majority, superdelegates will also vote. Biden can't pass his delegates off to Harris or any other candidate. In that regard, Harris is on her own and has to win the delegates on her own. It's not yet clear if anyone will challenge Harris for the Democratic nomination.

Polls have shown very little difference from Biden. Across recent polls, Harris trails Trump by two percentage points nationally on average, 46 percent to 48 percent. This is an improvement over Biden’s standing in the race: He trailed Trump by three percentage points in the polling average, 47 percent to 44 percent.

Will this be the shortest blog I ever wrote?

 I said all along Biden would not be president in 2025. Turns out he made my prediction come true. Blogger, owned by Google, refuses to allow me to post the image. So click the link below to view. I am looking for another blog provider that does not restrict my free speech.

https://i.ibb.co/5Mz7V9N/bidenstepdown.png

Sunday, July 14, 2024

Presidential Assassination Attempts

Most victims of Presidential assassinations or attempts have been Republican, Trump being the latest victim (with two democrats). Here's what I know of these assassinations:


Assassin: Richard Lawrence, Target: Andrew Jackson 

Verdict: Not guilty by reason of insanity (He was British born non-partisan and claimed to be King Richard III)


Assassin: John Wilkes Booth, Target: Abraham Lincoln (R)

Booth, a Democrat and Confederate sympathizer shot and killed Lincoln and was killed himself a few days later.


Assassin: Charles Julius Guiteau, Target: James Garfield (R) 

Guiteau, a self-described Republican loyalist was convinced that Garfield was going to destroy the Republican Party by scrapping the patronage system.


Assassin: Leon Czolgosz, Target: William McKinley (R) 

Czolgosz, an Leftist Anarchist shot and killed McKinley and was Executed 45 days after McKinley's death by electric chair.


Assassin: John Schrank, Target: Theodore Roosevelt (R)

German born Schrank suffered from Hallucinations. He shot Roosevelt point blank and had it not been for the 5 page speech folded up in the president's spectacle case, The assassination may have been successful


Assassin: Lee Harvey Oswald, Target: John F. Kennedy (D) 

Oswald, a self-described Marxist and Soviet sympathizer shot and killed Kennedy and was killed himself a two days later.


Assassin: John Hinckley Jr., Target: Ronald Reagan (R) 

Hinckley, a schizophrenic shot and injured Reagan trying to impress actress Jodie Foster and was found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Assassin: Thomas Matthew Crooks, Target: Donald Trump (R) 

Crooks used an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle that was allegedly purchased by his father to fire eight rounds from a rooftop around 400 feet north of the stage. He wounded Trump on the right ear, killed an audience member, and critically injured two others. He was killed by a Secret Service Counter Assault Team sniper immediately after the shooting. Crooks was a registered Republican, However, on January 20, 2021, at the age of 17, he donated $15 to the Progressive Turnout Project, a liberal voter turnout group, through the Democratic Party donation platform ActBlue. His donation was made the same day Joe Biden was sworn into office. *

* as of this writing, this is an ongoing investigation. Information may be redacted or added as details come in.

Thursday, June 27, 2024

The first presidential debate of 2024.

I'll be honest. I didn't have much expectations on this debate for 3 reasons:
CNN
Dana Nash &
Jake Tapper.
None of whom are "big Trump fans".

A week of preparation for Biden and even on his own turf, blundered and failed miserably. Imagine what his performance would have looked like if he came unprepared.

Trump came out fighting. He called out Biden's border policy and the deaths that border policy caused. He forced Biden to admit the inflation was on his watch. Plus much more. Clearly Trump won this round. 

Rumors are abound that CNN essentially gave this one to Trump. The idea is to give the DNC an excuse to nominate someone other then Biden. We shall see. On to the second debate.

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

TREASON! Biden should be in prison.

Biden committed Treason in the first 100 days in office. He continues to commit treason every day. How can I make such a bold claim? Simple, he violated his constitutional duties to keep the borders secure. He allowed mass illegals to flood our nation. However, he not only committed treason in this act, He's also possibly an accessory to murder and rape by the simple act of allowing these illegals into the country. 




More blood on the hands of Presidents Obama, Biden and those members of Congress who continue to trade lives of Americans in order to pander to illegal alien criminals and their ethnocentric special interest groups. 

Patty Morin, Mother of Rape and Murder victim Rachel Morin, stated it best. “It’s like they’re pretending these immigration problems don’t exist and people aren’t being harmed and killed by their policies, The victims are those that are being killed but also their loved ones that they’ve left behind. It’s devastating to the community.” She is Absolutely correct, Biden and the democrats don't care about these American lives. Their hunger for absolute power is insanity.

Under Biden's Open border policy, among the victims of Illegal aliens are:

Walter Wishoski Jr., 77 - struck by Drunk Illegal Alien Driver
(No image available)

Alex Wise Jr., 10 - killed by Drunk Illegal Alien Driver

Maria Gonzalez, 11 - Raped and murdered by illegal alien

Aiden Clark, 11 - killed by Drunk Illegal Alien Driver

Travis Wolfe, 12 - automobile accident involving Illegal Alien

Kayla Hamilton, 19 - Raped and murdered by illegal alien 

Laken Riley, 22 - Raped and murdered by illegal alien 

Lizbeth Medina, 16 - murdered by illegal alien

Rachel Morin, 37 - Raped and Murdered by illegal alien 

Jocelyn Nungaray, 12, was raped and murdered by 2 illegal Aliens.

UPDATE: More victims added:
Ian Matteo Garcia, 6 - Murdered by Illegal Alien.

Erpharo Gilbert, 46 - Murdered by Illegal Alien.

Maria Rios, 57Murdered by Illegal Alien.

Diane Hill Luckett, 67Murdered by Illegal Alien.

Julisa Molina Rivera, 31 - Sonia Argentina Guzman, 25 - Diana Velazquez Alvarado, 31 - Jose Jonathan Casarez, 18 and Daniel Enrique Laso, 9Murdered by Illegal Alien.

Jonathan Diller, 31 - Murdered by Illegal Alien

Valerie Reyes, 24 - Murdered by Illegal Alien

Ruby Garcia, 25 - Murdered by Illegal Alien











Biden's illegal alien death toll adds up.

Just to be clear to President Biden, these countries don't want their best coming to America. They send their criminals so that they won't have to deal with them. At what cost? LIVES you took an oath to protect. You are failing miserably.

The Border MUST be secured. Illegals MUST be deported! Joe Biden and the Democrats are NOT the ones to do it! Joe Biden and the Democrats CREATED this mess!

Liberals quickly point out that "the Emergency National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act" was blocked by Trump and republican leaders. The reason is simple, the act does not close the border.

The bill stated that temporary border emergency authority would be automatically activated by the Department of Homeland Security secretary if there is an average of 5,000 or more migrant encounters a day over seven consecutive days — or if there are 8,500 or more such encounters on any single day. 

The problem is, there shouldn't be a "Set number" before DHS does it's job. It should be done at 1, not 5,000. That is called a closed border. 

But a bill isn't really needed. The president has ALWAYS had the power to close the border. Joe Biden refuses to do so.

Monday, June 24, 2024

No Muslim nation wants Palestinians.

Nikki Haley asked the Islamic countries why they are not opening up their gates for Palestinian civilians from Gaza. 

She claimed that the Arab nations are not allowing the Palestinians because they know they "can't vet them" and they don't want "Hamas in their neighborhoods," asserting that "if Arab nations don't want them, then why would Israel?"

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi recently said that the current war is also an "attempt to push the civilian inhabitants to... migrate to Egypt".  

Jordan's King Abdullah II gave a similar message, as he said, "No refugees in Jordan, no refugees in Egypt." 

Since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, Egypt has helped maintain a blockade of the strip, sealing off its border and imposing tight controls over the passage of goods and people through Rafah. 

El-Sissi warned about the destruction of Egypt and Israel's 1979 peace deal. Stating that with the presence of Palestinian militia, Sinai "would become a base for attacks on Israel. Israel would have the right to defend itself and would strike Egyptian territory".  He would be right on that assessment as Sinai is part of Egypt.

He added that "the peace which we have achieved would vanish from our hands, all for the sake of the idea of eliminating the Palestinian cause".  That's Just Egypt alone. What of other Muslim nations?

Since 2011, the Egyptian military and police have battled ISIS-affiliated militants. The fear is that incoming Hamas militants could bring further instability to the region.

Sisi also generally views Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, suspiciously, with Cairo considering it a potential security threat.

So this is the last thing Sisi wants, both from a security perspective and from a political perspective, but, ultimately understanding Jordan and Egypt's firm stances requires an overall appreciation of the context.

You cannot understand the Palestinian refugee question while not at the same time also understanding the broader historical, political, and legal circumstances surrounding the issue.

This fear of being displaced is a significant feature of the Palestinian condition. Many of the Palestinians who live in Jordan, Egypt, and elsewhere in the region first arrived there after being displaced in 1948, or following the Six-Day War in 1967.

If you look at it purely from a humanitarian angle, you know a temporary displacement into Sinai would make the delivery of humanitarian assistance much, much easier, but on the other hand, we know it would not be temporary."

It is against this backdrop that Egypt and Jordan would not want to be seen accepting displaced Palestinians because "they don't want to be complicit to another catastrophe.

Let's keep in mind these Pro-Palestinian protesters have NO IDEA what they are actually calling for. If Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Syria or any other Arab/Muslim country won't accept Palestinians, why should we? Why should Israel?

Vetting is another main reason why they won't accept Palestinians, yet Joe Biden has no problem letting unvetted illegal aliens into our country.

Friday, May 31, 2024

What it's all about

 Now that Trump has been convicted and is awaiting appeal, Liberals are already out in force saying he can't run for President (yes he can, the constitution says so) ,that he can't vote (more on that later in this blog post), That he can't own a gun (I don't recall Trump ever saying he owned a gun) or...wait for this...He can't get Security Clearance.

Let me address the Presidency issue...that was covered in my previous post (Trump is convicted, how can he still run for president?

Next is the vote issue, Florida will follow New York law since Trump was convicted there. New York law states a convicted felon CAN vote as long as they are not incarcerated. In other words, if he's not in prison, he can vote.) Trump has no previous felonies, so the likelihood of any prison time is pretty remote. More likely he would be fined and/or placed on probation. This would still give him the ability to vote.

I'm not even going to address the Gun issue because I don't think it matters here as (to my knowledge) Trump doesn't own a gun.

FINALLY we get to the security clearance. IF Trump wins the presidency (Which is still very much possible), He AUTOMATICALLY gets security clearance.

The very fact these liberals are saying all this just proves one thing. It's not about a crime being committed, it's about keeping Trump out of the White House.

Trump is convicted, how can he still run for president?

 Simple! Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution lays down the requirements for President. 

"No person, except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of Thirty five years, and been fourteen years a Resident within the United States."

There's just three requirements, No part of the Constitution says people who have been convicted of crimes can't run for president.

Another thing to consider is the records could not have been falsified to defraud the voters in the 2016 election, because the Falsification was said to take place the following year in 2017. The election was over and the records were not made public.

The jury instructions given by Judge Juan Merchan dramatically favored the prosecution, telling them that while they had to unanimously conclude that Trump caused a false business entry to be made for the purpose of concealing "another crime."

They did not have to be unanimous as to what that other crime was. This will be one of the many issues that Trump’s legal team will raise on appeal. I would not be surprised if this conviction gets overturned, but that is not likely to happen before the election.

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Calls for a SCOTUS Hearing

 A few years ago an upside down American flag was flown at Justice Alito's home. Many rather uninformed democrats referred to it as an "Insurrection Flag".

On twitter, I was quick to point out that there is no such thing as an "insurrection flag". Flying a flag upside down was a sign of distress. I also pointed out BLM protesters doing the same thing (but worse) during the "Summer of Love" protests as shown below:



These BLM Protesters viewed the death of George Floyd as a form of distress, so at least these people knew what it meant (Albeit, burning the flag and writing on the flag was going to extremes). Liberals would be the first to say BLM Protests were not insurrection. But yet liberals call Justice Alito's Flag, (Alito knows the laws better then these liberals), an "insurrection flag". The sole reason is his political leanings. He's a conservative, those pictured above are leftist Marxists who align with Democrats.

There are now calls made by some Leftists saying the Senate needs to hold hearings on the Supreme Court. This won't happen because the constitution states there are 3 separate but equal branches of federal government:, The Executive (President), The Legislative (Congress) and the Judicial (Supreme Court).  Article 1 of The Constitution lays out the roles and Responsibilities of Congress. It does not grant Congress the power to interfere with the Judicial (Supreme Court). Except in the process of CONFIRMING a justice, That's it!

Article 2 of the constitution lays out the roles and responsibilities of the President and Vice President. Like Congress, the President can name a Justice to fill a vacancy, then it goes to Congress to confirm it, Like Congress, that's the limit of their power with regard to the Supreme Court.

Article 3 Lays out the Roles and Responsibilities of the Judicial branch. Like the other two branches, they are limited in their power over the others.

In short, Congress makes laws, the President Passes or Vetoes a law and the Judicial INTERPRET the laws and rule according to the Constitution.

Here is a Link to the Constitution for review.

In summary there is no law in the Constitution denying the Justices or their families freedom of expression as guaranteed in the 1st amendment of the Constitution, no more then the same freedoms exercised by BLM protesters. and the constitution lays out separation of powers among the three branches to keep each one from overpowering the others.



 

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Palestine claims to the land of Israel.

 

(Originally posted in my Christian blog)
Palestine, an Islamic "nation". Claims to be the original occupiers of the land of Israel. Islam is the youngest of 3 Abrahamic religions, formed 7 CENTURIES after Christianity. That's 700 years.

In the 1st century B.C.E., (800 years before Islam) the Kingdom of Judea was conquered by the Roman Empire. There is no historical dispute that in both the early Roman period and the Greek period, most of the Jewish people lived in the Land of Israel.

For the Romans, the name "Palestine" had nothing to do with modern-day Palestinians, who of course did not even remotely exist at the time. The Romans knew the coastal region of the Land of Israel as "Palestine," which was named after the ancient Philistine people who once inhabited the coastal territory of the Land of Israel.

A 2019 DNA study of skeletons exhumed from Philistine tombs in the coastal Israeli cities of Ashdod and Ashkelon found that the Philistines come from a "southern European gene pool." In other words, the ancient Philistines have no genetic relation whatsoever to the modern Palestinian-Arabs.

Before the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the only people who called themselves "Palestinians" were the Jews. Many Zionist and Jewish organizations in Israel even incorporated the name Palestine into their names.

A mandate to rule the Land of Israel—the British Mandate for Palestine, from the ancient Roman name—was given to the British (among other areas). A mandate was given for a limited time, with the aim of preparing the local people for eventual independence and self-rule. 

Islamic Palestine has never existed. The Jewish people are the rightful owners of Israel. They were there CENTURIES before Islam even existed.

Thursday, April 4, 2024

The E. Jean Carroll allegations.

DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY. EVERYTHING IN THIS BLOG IS MY OWN OPINION AND OBSERVATION. AS WELL AS THAT OF LEGITIMATE RAPE VICTIMS.

I know and have read accounts of legitimate rape victims. Years afterwards, they remember even the most minute details of their rape. It's an experience they would love to be able to forget, but they cannot. 

Rape victims report their rapes as soon as possible while everything is "fresh" (for lack of a better term). They DO NOT wait DECADES to report a rape. 

E. Jean Carroll cannot remember these details. She doesn't remember the EXACT DATE, only that it happened in the 90's. Over 24 years ago with a 10 year window.

In a 1994 Esquire interview, Carroll asked Lyle Lovett about the size of his penis. Carroll told the Hartford Courant about the interview saying that Lovett had “ripped off my clothes – journalistically speaking, of course, at every turn in this story.” The article was titled, “How to Be a Man.” Carroll noted in the article that Lovett had been a journalism major in college.

Some E. Jean Carroll Tweets:

"Sex Tip I Learned From My Dog: When in heat, chase the male until he collapses with Exhaustion...then jump him!"

"How do you know your 'unwanted sexual advance' is unwanted, until you advance it?"

"Would men have invented chastity belts, veils, and croks if women weren't just unbelievably HOT?---Honey, you were BORN to seduce!"

"There is no such thing as a slut. Only sexual geniuses."

"What CAN be done about the penis? It gets large when you want it small, and stays small when you want it large."

"It's not the most beautiful woman, No. No, It's the woman who makes the least mistakes, who seduces the most men."

Trump lawyer, Joe Tacopina repeatedly asked Ms Carroll why she did not shout when the alleged assault occurred.

"I'm not a screamer," she told Mr Tacopina, adding that some women do not come forward about sexual assaults because they are asked why they did not scream.

"I'm telling you he raped me whether I screamed or not," she told Mr Tacopina at one point.

The Trump lawyer also pressed Ms Carroll on why she did not report the assault at first to the police.

The former Elle magazine columnist replied that she was a member of the "silent generation", saying women her age were taught to keep quiet.

Mr Tacopina also questioned Ms Carroll on why she could not recall the specific date of the assault. The writer later conceded that certain parts of her story were "difficult to conceive of".

Tuesday, April 2, 2024

Easter and Transgenderism DO NOT belong together EVER.

March 31, 2024. What day is that? Easter for most Americans. TransGenderism awareness day for Joe Biden. Only 24 hours later (Monday) did Biden backtrack and "wish" Americans a happy Easter.

Apparently leftists think Jesus would have no problem with Transgenderism. I say FALSE!

Jesus would tell you "the Father does not make mistakes".

God is not human, that He should lie, not a human being, that He should change His mind. Does He speak and then not act? Does He promise and not fulfill?” Numbers 23:19

The very core of Transgenderism goes against that statement. God made a person a boy. That person feels he should be a girl. Therefore he thinks God made a mistake.

Genesis 1:27 reads: "So God created mankind in his own image,

    in the image of God he created them;

    male and female he created them."

Two Genders, and ONLY two.

The Bible, the Torah and the Koran, They all state God created man in his own image, male and female. Nowhere do you find God making a mistake there. Jesus loves the person, NOT the sin. Transgenderism, like homosexuality or bisexuality, are in fact sinful acts.

The Bible makes this abundantly clear, when it says man should not lay with a man as he would a woman. This statement established two things. Leviticus 18:22: Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.

Number one, the act of sexual intercourse is intended to procreate. That requires a man AND a woman. Two of the same gender cannot procreate. Even a transgender person.

Number two, This is part of God's design. Homosexuality, transgenderism or the acts thereof go against that design.

Even the act of Cross dressing (drag queens) is sinful:

A woman shall not wear a man’s garment, nor shall a man put on a woman’s cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God” (Deuteronomy 22:5).

In summary:

For everyone who does any of these abominations, the persons who do them shall be cut off from among their people. So keep my charge never to practice any of these abominable customs that were practiced before you, and never to make yourselves unclean by them: I am the Lord your God” (Leviticus 18:29-30). 

There's not a Jew, Christian or Muslim who would disagree with the following Statement:

God is the definition of Perfection. He is incapable of making mistakes.

Monday, March 25, 2024

Engeron violated at least 5 of Trump's rights under law

Arthur Engeron violated Trumps Constitutional rights:


First Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The 1st Amendment is about Freedom of speech. The notion that the government will not interfere with the ability of the people, the press, or religious groups to express their views or to protest in favor of them. (Gag orders)


Fifth Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

The 5th Amendment is commonly known as the double jeopardy law. Those tried and acquitted for a crime cannot be tried again for that same crime. Also, the accused cannot be asked to be a witness against themselves.


Sixth Amendment

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

The 6th Amendment is about the right of all citizens of the United States to a speedy and fair public trial. This also means an impartial jury and the right to a defense counsel and witnesses in their favor. It also infers the concept of the assumption of innocence until proven guilty. (Engeron Made it clear he was biased against Trump, eliminating Fair trial. No Jury.)


Eighth Amendment


Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

The 8th Amendment is a ban on extreme punishments for crimes, focusing on those that are “cruel and unusual” and on excessive fines or bail. (Half a billion...I rest my case on this one.)


Fourteenth Amendment


Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The 14th Amendment is the assertion that all those born or naturalized within the United States are citizens of the United States. Furthermore, the promise that no state will enforce any law that will damage these privileges in any way. This is also known as the Equal Protection Clause and was ratified on July 9, 1868. (14th states "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, Liberty, or property WITHOUT DUE PROCESS of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." See amendments 6 and 8)

Thursday, March 21, 2024

A Bloodbath

 While speaking about the potential loss of U.S. auto manufacturing jobs to foreign countries, former President Donald Trump said if he isn’t elected, “it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country.”

President Joe Biden’s campaign quickly accused Trump of promoting “political violence.” The Trump campaign said Trump was clearly using the term in the context of an economic bloodbath.

“If you actually watch and listen to the section, he was talking about the auto industry and tariffs, Biden’s policies will create an economic bloodbath for the auto industry and autoworkers.”

That explanation seems the most plausible, given the context of Trump’s comments.

Speaking at a rally on the grounds of the Dayton International Airport in Ohio, Trump said that over the last three decades, Mexico has siphoned off U.S. auto manufacturing jobs, and he accused China of building car manufacturing plants in Mexico that will cost U.S. autoworkers their jobs.

Here is the EXACT quote made by Trump: "China now is building a couple of massive plants where they’re going to build the cars in Mexico and think, they think, that they’re going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border. Let me tell you something to China, if you’re listening President Xi, and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal. Those big monster car manufacturing plants that you’re building in Mexico right now, and you think you’re going to get that, you’re going to not hire Americans, and you’re going to sell the cars to us? No. We’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars. If I get elected. Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath, for the whole — that’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars."

On Truth Social on March 18, Trump wrote that his words were being purposely taken out of context.

“The Fake News Media, and their Democrat Partners in the destruction of our Nation, pretended to be shocked at my use of the word BLOODBATH, even though they fully understood that I was simply referring to imports allowed by Crooked Joe Biden, which are killing the automobile industry,” Trump wrote, promising that if elected U.S. auto manufacturing “WILL THRIVE LIKE NEVER BEFORE.”

Wednesday, March 13, 2024

Narratives

Donald Trump has been said to have committed rape and insurrection by the left. He has not been charged, much less convicted of insurrection. He was found not guilty of rape. Democrats are so power mad that they go to great lengths to try and keep Trump from being able to campaign. Resorting to lawfare to tie him up on court. Also trying to financially ruin him.

ABC Had Rep. Nancy Mace on to discuss 2024 campaigns. The host, George Stephanopoulus, immediately asked her how she can support a rapist as she, herself, was a rape victim. Congresswoman Mace proceeded to rip into Stephanopoulus, stating Trump was found not guilty of Rape in a court trial.

Mace continued by drawing differences from her rape and the alleged one with E. Jean Carrol. Starting with Carroll's "jokingly" discussing with Rachel Maddox on national TV how they would go on a shopping spree with Trump's money. Contrast that with Mace's low profile on her rape. It's been over 25 years since Mace spoke of her rape. But I am pretty sure she remembers the date and year. Something Carroll has trouble with.

Democrats are planning on going just as far as what they accuse Trump of doing in 2020. If Trump wins and they retake Congress. Democrats plan to not certify Trumps election. As I posted over 3 years ago. (Biden not yet president elect). Their actions would invoke the 12th amendment. The house would vote for president, the Senate for vice president. The rules for both houses would be the same, ONE VOTE per state regardless of the number of seats. 

The Democrats are also allowing illegal immigrants into the country intentionally. The census counts EVERYONE living in the country. In their minds the Illegals would boost the electoral count in blue states. They can't win on their record so they do what they do best. CHEAT!!

One way to fight them is to vote most (if not ALL) PROGRESSIVE Democrats out, replacing them with conservatives (or at a MINIMUM, Moderate Democrats).

Juanita Broaddrick accused Clinton of raping her in 1978. 
Leslie Millwee accused Clinton of sexually assaulting her in 1980. 
Paula Jones accused Clinton of exposing himself to her in 1991 as well as sexually harassing her.
Kathleen Willey accused Clinton of groping her without her consent in 1993. 

In 1999, Eileen Wellstone reiterated to reporters that she had accused Clinton of sexually assaulting her in 1969, when they were students at Oxford. Wellstone filed a complaint with the university, but no charges were brought against Clinton. 

A campaign staffer, Sandra Allen James, accused Clinton of sexually assaulting her in his hotel room in 1991. She claimed that he exposed himself to her and forced her to conduct oral sex on him while they were sitting on the couch. 

A former professor from the University of Arkansas claimed Clinton had groped a female student and tried to trap her in his office when he was a professor. This would later be backed up by a piece written by Daniel Harris and Teresa Hampton, which alleged that students at the university confirmed that Clinton had tried to force himself on them when he was a professor. 

Karen Hinton, who served in the Clinton administration under the HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo, told journalist Michael Isikoff that Clinton had harassed her at a fundraiser in 1984. Hinton claimed that Clinton had been staring at her and that he wrote down his hotel room number and a question mark on a napkin and gave it to her, which she said made her feel humiliated. 

Yet George Stephanopoulus says Nothing of this. In fact he worked to cover it up during the Clinton Presidency.

Not only is Joe Biden’s creepiness around young girls not something to be dismissed lightly, his refusal to fully apologize and change his ways is indicative of how little he cares about sexual assault. 

Lefties Conveniently forget these things. Tara Reade, who's that? Set our Sights on E. Jean Carroll. Lefties Discount Ms Reade's claims of sexual assault, yet totally agree with Carroll's rape and sexual assault claims. 



March 13 Polling breakdown - Not looking good for Biden

Biden's job approval rating has only been higher then his Unfavorable rating during the first 8 months of his presidency. At this point in their presidency since Polling started with Truman, NOBODY has scored as low as Biden. Truman came closest but still had a 0.8% higher favorable rating. No other president has had a border crisis as Biden has. And the open border is INTENTIONAL. For comparison, Biden's Approval rating is currently 38.0%, At this point of their presidency, Truman was at 38.8% and Jimmy Carter was at 48.9%. 

Among Presidents that served a single term: Again, Biden at 38.0%, Trump at 41.7%, George H.W. Bush 40.5% Carter 48.9%.

The latest Harris poll asked 2,017 Registered voters, "If the election were held today who would you vote for?" 44% of Independent voters said Donald Trump, 29% said Joe Biden and 27% were not sure. Independent voters are the ones to watch. Democrat voters will go with Biden, Republican voters will go with Trump but Independent's can go either way.

The most recent Yougov poll asked the following: " Regardless of who you prefer, who do you think would win the presidential election if Joe Biden were the Democratic candidate and Donald Trump were the Republican candidate?"

Donald Trump 45%

Joe Biden 33%

Undecided 22%

One thing is for certain, the last 8 polls put Biden Disapproval ratings well above 52% and his approval ratings tanking.


Thursday, December 17, 2020

Biden Not YET President-Elect

Biden is not OFFICIALLY President-Elect until Congress certifies the votes. It takes Just ONE Representative and ONE Senator to object (I'm fairly sure Texas Senator Ted Cruz COULD be the one Objection in the senate, Possibly Kevin McCarthy of California on the house side. If these two object to the certification, It will invoke the 12th Amendment of the constitution and the whole process comes down to votes in the house for president and in the senate for Vice President. Each state in both chambers will get only one vote regardless how many representatives a state has. For Example, California has the most representatives of any state, 55 of them. However,like the other 49 states, California does not get 55 votes, it only gets ONE.

In the 2020 Election, Republicans got a majority of delegates in the house. So if every delegation voted on party lines, Biden would lose 24-26.

On the senate side, regardless of the GA Runoff Election, Harris could also lose. Unlike the house, each state only has 2 senators. However the same rules apply to their VP Elections, only one vote per state.

As of December 17, 2020 48 Democrats and 50 Republicans make up the senate for the upcoming congress. IF both Democrats win the GA Runoff, that would split the Senate 50/50 and make Vice-President Pence the tie-breaker. Again, if all senators vote along party lines, including Pence, Harris loses.

If the Uncumbent Senators in GA (Both Republican) get reelected, the situation gets even more dire for Kamala Harris. With a 48-52 Majority, Pence won't need to vote if senate votes along party lines, Pence is as good as Re-elected!

Again, this all only starts if ONE Representative and ONE Senator object to the certification in Congress.

 Granted, Rinos Like Mitt Romney Most likely will not vote on party lines! Which makes the Reelection in the GA Runoff CRUCIAL in this scenario.



Friday, April 10, 2020

Saw this on facebook and HAD to post it!

I am not the author, but I wish I was.
****Also as a side note;
This may be happening in other countries and doesn't only reflect USA. ****

We are seeing the most draconian measures enforced at all levels of government that we've ever seen in our lifetimes, and yet rather than being alarmed by the things going on, so many of you applaud.

*People are being arrested for spending too much time outside, and you applaud.
*Pastors are being arrested for daring to hold church services, and you applaud.
*A child's birthday party is raided by police, and you applaud.
*A young woman is ticketed for going on a leisurely drive alone because it's deemed "non-essential travel", and you applaud.
*A parade of school teachers and administrators who wanted to drive through neighborhoods and wave at children is busted up by cops because they were "nonessential," and you applaud.
*A lone paddle boarder in the ocean on a beach without any other people around is arrested because he's violating quarantine orders, and you applaud.
*People are being denied life saving medical treatments because they're not a priority right now (not "essential" as deemed by the government) as the entirety of our medical system is focused on one thing, and you applaud.
*Businesses are beings forcibly closed and padlocked and owners arrested for refusing to shut down, and you applaud.
*Dairy farmers (and soon, other farmers) are being incentivized to stop dairy farming and to sell their herds, and you don't seem to understand the implications.

You're being told to use hotlines and online forms provided by your local governments to report your neighbors who don't obey, and you comply. You scold people day after day for not obeying government edicts, and if any of us dare to question what's happening, you lecture about how we're a danger to society and and we just don't care about people dying.

You've somehow managed to convince yourselves that the people whose lives are affected by a virus are MUCH more important than the people whose lives are being destroyed (and in many cases, leading to death) by the effects of a worldwide economic shutdown and impending worldwide depression the likes of which no one has ever seen before.

At what point will you start QUESTIONING what's going on? How far does the government have to push before you're jolted awake from your slumber? How far are you willing to go with this?

If they told you to load your families onto train cars so that you could be taken to Virus Protection Facilities for your own safety, would you do it?

YES. Yes, you would.That much has become painfully obvious to me. And the whole time, you'd be shaking your finger and yelling at those of us who refused, accusing us of being "a danger to society" and "not caring if people die."

But they don't have to load you onto train cars and take you to Virus Protection Facilities, or force you to comply, because you do that voluntarily. They control your mind. They control you through fear. They control you by convincing you that the world is a scary dangerous place, but they're here to protect you, care for you, and keep you safe, just as long as you OBEY.

They know that as long as you're locked inside your comfortable home with Netflix, Hulu, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and a cell phone, while dangling a check in front of you like a carrot on a stick, you'll comply. No force is necessary for the majority of the herd.

YOU ARE IMPRISONED, willingly, and you're too blind to see it.

*Copied, Author Unknown*

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Historical facts

On the issue of slavery: historians say the Democrats gave their lives to expand it, the Republicans gave their lives to ban it.

The Democrats: Democrats fought to expand slavery while Republicans fought to end it.

Democrats passed those discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws.”

Democrats supported  and passed the Missouri Compromise to protect slavery.

In the early days of slavery it was a crime to teach slaves to read. The punishment was lashes-to the bare back. Initially both white and black participants in reading lessons were punished. Lashings were later reserved solely for the black student. The Democrats knew then and know now that knowledge is power. They aggressively fight school choice. One reason could be that they’re terrified that black people will learn about their history and the history of the 2 Parties.

Democrats voted to expand slavery with the Kansas Nebraska Act.

Democrats supported and passed the Dred Scott Decision. The decision claims, “The court found that no black, free or slave, could claim U.S. citizenship, and therefore blacks were unable to petition the court for their freedom.” Essentially this decision ruled that slaves were not citizens, but property.

At the time of the Civil War the 2 parties were sharply divided. The Pro-Slavery Party was Democrats. The Anti-Slavery Party were Republicans. Democrats declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican, because the Republican Party was known as the Party for Blacks. Yet today black people in the Democratic Party attack other black people for being Conservatives, or Republicans. They accuse them of being a sellout.

The Clash between the (D)Party of Slavery and the (R) Party Against Slavery culminated in the Civil War. At the time of the Civil War the number of Republican slave owners was ZERO. On the eve of the Civil War there were 4 million slaves in America-every single one of them was owned by a Democrat.

Harriet Tubman was a Republican then and surely would be one now. Naturally she was an  abolitionist. She escaped from slavery in 1849. She then repeatedly risked her life helping slaves to find freedom via the Underground Railroad. She carried a gun while helping slaves to escape Democrats and while serving as an armed scout and spy for the United States Army during the American Civil War. And she was religious. After the war Harriet Tubman cared for the elderly and helped freed slaves.

Democrats opposed The Emancipation Proclamation put forth by Republican Abraham Lincoln to eradicate slavery.

Bottom line-Abraham Lincoln-a Republican-freed the slaves -in spite of Democrats who Resisted  Abolition.

January 31, 1865-Democrats still want their slaves. Dems opposed the 13th Amendment that abolished slavery. Republicans voted to end slavery.

This part of the timeline points to a history of Democratic thuggery-perhaps spawning the first “conspiracy theory.” In January of 1865 Lincoln’s fight to free the slaves ended in victory with the Republicans passing the 13th Amendment. Two and a half months later Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by Democrat John Wilkes Booth.

The Freedmen’s Bureau was established after the Civil War to help freed slaves and poor white people from the South to recover after the war. Again-opposed by Democrats.

Most people do not know that it was white Republicans who financed, funded and sponsored the colleges and universities for African Americans in the 1800s and early 1900s, while Democrats, with brutal force, opposed every effort made by Republicans to educate African Americans.

In the Reconstruction Era after the Civil War, hundreds of Black Republicans were elected to Southern state legislatures. There were 22 black Republicans elected to Congress by 1900. Democrats did not elect a black man to Congress until 1935.

During the Reconstruction Era the Republicans sent troops to the South to ensure the freedom of the slaves. When the troops left, the Southern Democrats immediately reinstated White Supremacy in the area. They instituted “Black Codes,” preventing blacks from owning businesses and property, and continued initiatives to prevent black people from voting.

Today’s Left encourages their angry zombies in the black community to demand reparations for slavery. But it’s the Democrats who voted against  a Republican initiative to offer reparations in 1865. Republican Union General William Tecumseh Sherman issued Field Order 15 that prescribed that every free slave be given 40 Acres and a Mule. Had the Democrats not defeated that policy, every generation of black people who would have received that gift would have enormous wealth today. They should seek reparation from the DNC.

1866-Democrats didn’t care about children of slaves. Democrats opposed The Civil Rights Bill of 1866-granting citizenship to all persons born in the United States. 1867-Democrats didn’t care about child slaves’ parents either. Democrats opposed The Reconstruction Act that provided former slaves with natural citizenship.

Black Face-back in the day. The offensive caricatures of black people in minstrel shows are compliments of the Democrats. One of the common characters in the Minstrel shows was Jim Crow, the term used for the laws of segregation that Democrats supported and Republicans sought to eradicate.

1868-Democrats opposed the 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment  affected all states. It granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” including  recently freed slaves. It also  forbade denying any person “life, liberty or property, without due process of law and  equal protection under laws.

1870-Democrats always opposed fair elections. Democrats opposed the 15th Amendment, granting African American men the right to vote. Democrats still don’t want black people to cast their vote. By promoting the Big Lie that Democrats “switched” places with the Republican Party and became the anti-racist Party is another way to steal the Black vote-by preventing them from making a truly informed decision. By opposing Voter ID Laws today the Democrats would allow dead people and illegals to steal the vote of a Black American.

The Democrats always want a free pass to terrorize. The Enforcement Act of 1870 was opposed by Democrats because it protected the black community from terrorists threats aimed at discouraging black people from voting, running for office or serving on juries. Of course they opposed it-they were the ones perpetrating the threats.

The Democrats oppose shutting down their terrorist organization. The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 aka the  Forced Act of 1871 aka the Civil Rights Act of 1871 was designed to protect the black community from KKK terrorism. It allowed President Grant to suspend the Writ of Habeas Corpus, declare Martial Law and use military intervention to prevent the conspiratorial violence of the KKK. Whatever name you want to call it, Democrats opposed it. Of course-the KKK, like Antifa, was their militia. An interesting note-this act prohibited groups of people from banding together “or to go in disguise upon the public highways, or upon the premises of another” with the intention of violating citizens’ constitutional rights. Sounds eerily similar to  Antifa tactics used today and celebrated by Leftstream media. Their refusal to shut down their terrorist organization is similar to what we see today following the Charlottesville incident-the Left and their media refuse to  name Antifa or BLM as domestic terrorist organizations or disavow their violence.

Democrats fought the Civil Rights Act of 1875.

Part of the series of Enforcement Acts, or Force Acts forbade discrimination in trains, hotels or other public spaces. It was opposed by Democrats.

Democrats still abhor diversity-particularly as it regards ideology. Today’s Democrats discriminate against anyone who does not share their views. Even when it makes no sense. For example, when the Berkeley protesters railed against MILO, some signs read “Get out of here you Nazi scum.” MILO has Jewish ancestry, and unlike the Nazi Left, he represents free speech. If a woman, a gay person or a minority is not a Hillbot, they will be attacked.

1896. Democrats vote for separation. “Plessy vs Ferguson” was a law supported by Democrats that touted “separate but equal” in order to segregate public facilities, such as drinking fountains.

1909- Birth of the NAACP - In 1909  Republicans founded the NAACP in response to continued lynchings from the hooded Democrats-the KKK.

1913-The Birth of a Nation - Democrat President Woodrow Wilson revived the KKK upon taking office. He enjoyed a special screening of the  White Supremacist silent film “The Birth of a Nation” in the White House. The film glorified the KKK and denigrated blacks.

Revival of Racism. The Federal Government had been desegregated, thanks to continued Republican efforts. Democratic President Woodrow Wilson re-segregated it. Wilson refused to enforce Civil Rights Laws. He insisted that his motivation was to “protect” black people from ” friction.” When black members of Congress protested he said, “Segregation is not humiliating but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentleman.” The  insufferable lie and betrayal cut deep.

1916-The birth of Eugenics. Planned Parenthood was founded in 1916 by the woman Hillary Clinton greatly admires-Margaret Sanger. Sanger was a Nazi-esque eugenicist who sought control over the birth rate of those she felt were inferior.  She said ” We don’t want the word to get out that we intend to exterminate the negro population.” Her methods actually inspired Hitler.
 She also seemed to advocate a type of slavery. People whom Sanger considered unfit should be sent to “farm lands and homesteads” where “they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives.” In 1926 Margaret Sanger spoke at a KKK rally. She was delighted with the result.  “In the end I accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were offered.

1933-1935 FDR - Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt said No to “Negroes.” FDR  excluded  blacks from the New Deal.

Corruption in the Supreme Courts. Democrat President FDR’s first appointment to the Supreme Court was a life member of the Ku Klux Klan, Sen. Hugo Black, Democrat of Alabama.

Second rates citizens in the Armed Forces. “Negroes” were good enough to fight and to die for the US. But not good enough to share quarters with. Democrat President FDR  opposed  integration of the armed  forces.

 Hitler credits Hillary’s admired woman Margaret Sanger for giving him the idea to exterminate the Jews, “imbeciles”  and others through Eugenics.

KKK for VP - Democrat President Franklin D.  Roosevelt’s choice for  vice president in 1944 was Harry Truman, who had joined the Ku Klux Klan in  Kansas City in  1922.

Harry Truman’s Hate speech- Former KKK Member and Democratic President Truman was a racist and Antisemite. He called Jews  kikes and said they were “very, very selfish,” and turned his back on those murdered in the Holocaust. Truman once called Adam Clayton Powell that “damned n****r preacher,” and wrote in a private letter that, “I think one man is just as good as another so long as he’s not a n****r or a Chinaman.”

Democrats Resisted education for Black people. Again. 1954-Democrats sided with the school board in Brown vs The Board of Education. They fought to keep schools segregated.

Republicans pushed for equal education. Republican President Eisenhower appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision, allowing schools to be integrated.

Democrats continued to Resist equal education. In 1956 the Democrats presented “The  Southern Manifesto” to fight the school desegregation.

Strom Thurmand was a Democratic Senator from South Carolina. He wrote the first draft of the Southern Manifesto.

Republicans enforced equal education. Republican President Dwight Eisenhower sent troops into the South to force the racist Democrats to comply with desegregating the schools.

1964 Civil Rights Act - An Act that “ended segregation in public places and banned employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin, is considered one of the crowning legislative achievements of the  civil rights movement.” The 1964 Civil Rights Act also expanded the ability to report violations by establishing The  United State Civil Rights Commission. Republicans passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Democrats Resisted.

Democrats loved lynching. Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Democrats  blocked anti-lynching legislation. Democrats favored the atrocity of “Strange Fruit.”

In 1963 Democrat Governor George Wallace of Alabama declared there would be  segregation forever.

The March on Washington-a Republican initiative. - A. Phillip Randolph, a black Republican, organized the 1963 March by Dr. King on Washington. Martin Luther King  Jr. was an Independent.

Hillary’s mentor was KKK “Exalted Cyclops” Robert Byrd. Robert Byrd  filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

1966 -Senator Edward Brooke - “Edward W. Brooke’s election to the U.S. Senate in 1966 ended an 85–year absence of African–American Senators. Brooke was the first popularly elected Senator and the first black politician from Massachusetts to serve in Congress.” “While he professed loyalty to the Republican Party, he was an independent thinker who acted according to his conscience. Throughout his political career, Brooke demonstrated resiliency and defined himself as a representative of his entire constituency rather than as an African–American Senator seeking solely to advance black interests.” Senator Brooke was also the first popularly elected Senator to serve in Congress. Massachusetts has always had its fair share of racists, yet he was elected by popular vote. Clearly strides had been made. The weapon of Identity Politics and the repeated drone of racism and oppression garners votes for Democrats but destroys past accomplishments and the mindset needed for individual success.

Martin Luther King was no Democrat. Martin Luther King Sr. was a Republican. Martin Luther King Jr was an Independent.

Malcolm X said that ‘The white Liberal is the worst enemy to America, and the worst enemy to the black man.” He also said that “The Democrats are playing you for a political chump and if you vote for them not only are you a chump you are a traitor to your race.

JFK is the brand the Party floats on to this day. Yet even JFK had the hallmarks of being a White Supremacist. When he returned from Nazi Germany he praised Hitler. “He had within him the stuff of which legends are made.” He also stated, “You can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived.” Then-Senator JFK voted against the 1957 Civil rights  Act.

JFK opposed  the 1963 March on Washington by Dr.  King. Imagine-if our favorite Democratic President had his way, we never would have heard the magnificent ” I Have a Dream” speech by Dr. Martin Luther King. Chilling.

The March on Washington was for jobs and freedom. Under Barrack Obama our economy tanked and jobs dried up. The black community was hardest hit with unemployment that reached as high 16.8%. Income fell. Within the first 7 months under President Trump our economy is soaring and the black unemployment rate has improved tremendously. All in spite of Democrats, not because of them.

More  JFK disillusionment. President JFK had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the  FBI. The Atlantic explains that “Kennedy acted reluctantly, and his order remained secret until May of 1968, just a few weeks after King’s assassination and a few days before Kennedy’s own.”

Democrat President Bill Clinton’s mentor was U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat and a supporter of racial segregation. Fulbright also opposed  Brown vs. Board of Education.

President Bill Clinton’s mentor Fulbright joined Hillary’s mentor Robert Byrd and Al Gore’s father in filibustering the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Fulbright  also fought the 1957 Civil Right Act.

Up until 2005, the Democrat Party (the oldest political party in America) never elected a black man to the United States Senate, the Republicans elected three.

In her first run in 2007 Hillary gave a particularly cringeworthy speech pandering to black voters, Hillary spoke in what she felt was a “black accent.” saying “Aaah don’t feel no ways tarhrd”. Imagine if this had been Trump or Pence.

Throughout Hilary’s  first failed campaign against Barrack Obama she made many racist remarks-including accusing him of being  a drug dealer. She  also said that Obama  had no chance to win- because he’s black. The media did a great job of burying the fact that it was Hillary’s campaign that started the Birther Conspiracy.  MSM successfully pinned that on then-Candidate Trump and used it to ridicule him.

M-mmm. Dat hosssauce be goood! There were a couple of embarrassing  windows into the racist soul of Leftist Queen Hillary. One was during her 2016 campaign. While pandering to black voters she claimed that she carries hot sauce with her wherever she goes. Sadly, they seemed impressed, except for one free-thinker who asked if she was just saying that to get the black vote. She quipped, “Is it working?”

The KKK donated 20K to Hillary's campaign. She kept it. Never disavowed.

KKK Grand Dragon Will Quigg endorsed Hillary Clinton for President in 2016.  She never disavowed. Imagine if this guy endorsed Then-Candidate Trump.

Hillary and her campaign staff didn’t hide their disdain for others. Latinos-Hillary’s 2016 campaign staff referred to Hispanic engagement as “The Taco Bowl.” They were also called  “Needy Latinos.” She never disavowed. Catholics-Her campaign staff was busted in Wikileaks for referring to Catholics as “backwards” and that the religion is a “bastardization of the faith.” Jewish donors-“Those people.” Her campaign intended to use Bernie’s Jewish faith against him. Apparently rigging the primary won out. All Americans who don’t like her- “a Basket of Deplorables.”

In 2009 Hillary accepted The Margaret Sanger Award  and gushed, “I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision …”

The Left  makes the “choice”to continue Margaret Sanger’s genocidal  mission through Planned Parenthood. Over 1,800  black babies are slaughtered every day. Roughly 30% of pregnancies in the black community end in abortion. The abortion rate in the black community is 3 times higher than others. If Democrats cared so much about minorities and “women’s health” you would never know it by their obsessive glorification of this genocidal institution. They are so Hell-bent on murdering unborn minorities and loathed white babies that there is a push to  make it the Abortion Party. If you’re not “pro-choice” you’re not invited. Alveda C. King, daughter of slain civil-rights leader A.D. King and niece of Martin Luther King, Jr., quotes her uncle often when outlining her opposition of abortion. [Martin Luther King, Jr.] once said, “The Negro cannot win as long as he is willing to sacrifice the lives of his children for comfort and safety.” How can the “Dream” survive if we murder the children? ”

The Democrats are still fighting against equal education for the black community by fighting School Choice tooth-and-nail. It’s the one thing that could end-once and for all- the vicious cycle of poverty that has been going on for decades. Of course if black people and others who are not racist were truly educated about history, they would never affiliate themselves with the racist Nazi Democratic Party. No wonder they want to control the education system.

Antifa thugs shut down free speech on campuses. Ann Coulter, MILO,  Ben Shapiro and others have been booted. It is essential that they follow their marching orders to shut off the free flow of information. It’s possible that if these protesters realized they’re being played by everything they claim to hate, they could turn their rage where it belongs. Antifa thugs attack men women, children, the elderly and the disabled at peaceful rallies or just for wearing a MAGA hat. Anti-Trumper “Liberals” trespass on people’s private property to tear down American flags, mailboxes with stars and stripes, or political signage.

Another timeless technique utilized by the Nazis is the ol’ Divide and Conquer. Nothing works better than ideally igniting a race war by exploiting the race card. Today’s Nazis run with the same tired old ball. They’re pulling out all the stops to turn the Charlottesville incident into a full blown Civil War. In WWII Nazis used Propaganda to entice black US soldiers to defect and join the Nazis. Although they hated black people every bit as much as they hated the Jews, they pretended to be their friend and lured them with free food. Much like the Democrats did under LBJ  with this “War on Poverty” welfare system.

Communists and Nazis know that the best way to control a population is to remove God from people’s lives, so the government will be the almighty. Rather than outright forbidding religion, the Left has promoted the idea that it’s trendy, cool  or intelligent to be an atheist. Paganism, witchcraft and the occult  is considered “cool.”  Hillary-loving pop stars blatantly promote Satanism to their young audience. Radical Islam, however,  with its foundations in hate, violence, and genocide gets both pass and protection. The Democrats even booed God at the DNC Convention.

Professional race-baiters have made a tidy sum by stirring up conflict and fostering soul crushing resentment. BLM who? Obama not only did NOT call the violent perpetrators of the Ferguson Riot by name-Black Lives Matter-he invited the Soros funded terror group to the White House. Nothing bonds bro-fascists  more than killing pesky law enforcement. For years Obama attended the Parrish of Rev. Jeremiah Wright. His anti-American, racist tirades are shocking. No disavowing. Maxine Waters-racist windbag. In response to the Charlottesville Setup she lumped conservative Dr. Ben Carson in with her propaganda-based remarks. She called him a “White Wing Nationalist.” Jesse Jackson referred to Jews as Hymies and NY as Hymietown. There’s too many professional race-baiters to list here. Yet given the multiple  visits from BLM, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to Obama’s White House, it’s obvious that not only does  Democratic black racism get a pass, it’s welcomed. It serves an important purpose. To divide and conquer.

Joe Biden’s remark about Obama offer a good example of undercover racism. “I mean you’ve got the first sort of mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and nice-looking guy.” Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid showed his disdain for the black community with an embarrassing compliment about Obama’s speaking skills. He felt that the country was ready to vote for a ‘light-skinned’ African American with ‘no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.’”

Bernie Sanders was criticized-even by Dems. “When you’re white, you don’t know what it’s like to be living in a ghetto. You don’t know what it’s like to be poor. You don’t know what it’s like to be hassled when you walk down the street or when you get dragged out of a car.” His remarks (resulting from his beliefs) perpetuate stereotypes that all blacks are poor and live in housing projects while there are no poor white people.

So why would any black person in their right mind be a Democrat? When all efforts failed to prevent black people from voting, Democrats developed an new game plan-if black people are going to vote-let them vote Democrat. Democratic President Lyndon Baines Johnson spoke of his push for Civil Rights Legislation. He said,  “I’ll have those ni**ers voting Democratic for 200 years.” So if  a black  person signed onto the racist Nazi Democrat Party, they probably  just fell for the lies, propaganda and image branding that the Left has mastered.

Why would any decent white person in their right mind be a Democrat? It makes no sense that people who feel that racism and Antisemitism are repugnant would align themselves  with racist, Nazi Democrats. They probably  just fell for the lies, propaganda and image branding that the Left mastered.

So why would any Jewish person in their right mind be a Democrat? Sadly many “Liberal” Jews have been separated from the education of their faith as well as American history. The danger of the more lenient forms of Judaism often involve indoctrination into self-loathing. The “more hip” Liberal Jews often fight for Palestine and against Israel. Liberal Jews and “Liberals” who claim to hate Nazis  fall for the Democrats pinning the Nazi label on President Trump. They are utterly incapable of connecting the dots that he is the most pro-Israel President we’ve ever had. His daughter and her family are Orthodox Jews. It’s the Left who hates Israel. The Globalists, the Left and their Radical Islamic pals all want the same thing-for every last Jew to be wiped from the face of the earth. They fell for all the lies, propaganda and image branding that the Left has mastered.

The Democratic Party is THE Party of Nazis and Racists. The Globalists are White Supremacists. racists, Nazis and eugenicists. Their useful idiots army fights on behalf of the whitest most elite Nazi scum on earth. The Globalists are Nazis. UNESCO is waging war on Jerusalem and the Jews. The Left  allies itself with Radical Islamist's who want Israel destroyed and Jews eradicated. The entire history of the Civil Rights movement was spearheaded by Republicans in the 1800’s and aggressively opposed by Democrats. The only reason people think the parties switched is because LBJ admittedly bought the votes with bribery by expanding the welfare state. The Democratic exploitation of the black community from that point forward is a tragedy of epic proportions.

The “loving” Left cry out for diversity but attack black people for being conservatives. They label them as sellouts and Uncle Toms. But what could possibly be more of a sellout than to align yourself with the Party that has continually sought to suppress, rather than free and elevate black people? Some on the Left may wake up when they see this list. Others may wake up once  they realize they’ve been conned by the Russia/Trump Collusion Hoax. For those hopelessly addicted to their programmed lies and hatred, it’s too late.

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

Is Vindman a victim? No!

Vindman violated at least 7-8 laws under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Even ONE violation is grounds for a court martial. article 94 alone has TWO counts against him, and a maximum punishment of DEATH.

US Code, title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, chapter 47, Subchapter X, Section 888. Art. 88 - Contempt toward officials
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

US Code, title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, chapter 47, Subchapter X, Section 892. Art. 92. - Failure to obey order or regulation
Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation;
(2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by a member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or
(3) is derelict in the performance of his duties;
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

US Code, title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, chapter 47, Subchapter X, Section 895, article 94 - Mutiny or sedition
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;
(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;
(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.
(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

US Code, title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, chapter 47, Subchapter X, Section 931 Article 131 - Perjury

Any person subject to this chapter who in a judicial proceeding or in a course of justice willfully and corruptly—
(1) upon a lawful oath or in any form allowed by law to be substituted for an oath, gives any false testimony material to the issue or matter of inquiry; or
(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, subscribes any false statement material to the issue or matter of inquiry;
is guilty of perjury and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

US Code, title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, chapter 47, Subchapter X, Section 931 Article 131F - Noncompliance with procedural rules
Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1) is responsible for unnecessary delay in the disposition of any case of a person accused of an offense under this chapter; or
(2) knowingly and intentionally fails to enforce or comply with any provision of this chapter regulating the proceedings before, during, or after trial of an accused;
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

US Code, title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, chapter 47, Subchapter X, Section 931 Article 132 - Retaliation
(a) In General.—Any person subject to this chapter who, with the intent to retaliate against any person for reporting or planning to report a criminal offense, or making or planning to make a protected communication, or with the intent to discourage any person from reporting a criminal offense or making or planning to make a protected communication—
(1) wrongfully takes or threatens to take an adverse personnel action against any person; or
(2) wrongfully withholds or threatens to withhold a favorable personnel action with respect to any person;
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “protected communication” means the following:
(A) A lawful communication to a Member of Congress or an Inspector General.
(B) A communication to a covered individual or organization in which a member of the armed forces complains of, or discloses information that the member reasonably believes constitutes evidence of, any of the following:
(i) A violation of law or regulation, including a law or regulation prohibiting sexual harassment or unlawful discrimination.
(ii) Gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.
(2) The term “Inspector General” has the meaning given that term in section 1034(j) of this title.
(3) The term “covered individual or organization” means any recipient of a communication specified in clauses (i) through (v) of section 1034(b)(1)(B) of this title.
(4) The term “unlawful discrimination” means discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

US Code, title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, chapter 47, Subchapter X, Section 933, article 133 - Conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman
Any commissioned officer, cadet, or midshipman who is convicted of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

US Code, title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, chapter 47, Subchapter X, Section 934, article 134 General Articles
Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special, or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court. As used in the preceding sentence, the term “crimes and offenses not capital” includes any conduct engaged in outside the United States, as defined in section 5 of title 18, that would constitute a crime or offense not capital if the conduct had been engaged in within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, as defined in section 7 of title 18.